Medical students and residents (regardless of gender) are forced to have an opinion because they are subjected to the fluid sprays and long hours of caring for these women who should be having tubal ligations instead of babies.

If you are using the term “liberal” in a political context, then I think you might want to reconsider that statement. Every liberal-minded individual I know, including myself, supports a woman’s right to choose whether or not to carry a baby to term. On the contrary, it’s typically the conservative, right-wing, Christian Fundamentalist Republicans who jump on the “Pro-Life” bandwagon (yet, ironically, support the death penalty). These people want to make every accidental or unwanted pregnancy in the world result in a baby. Unfortunately, if a woman doesn’t want it, she’s not just going to change her mind and become a great mother - she’s either going to keep the child and neglect it so much that it becomes one more burden for the rest of society, or put it up for adoption where, statistically, it is NOT highly likely that some nice happy family is going to come along and snatch the kid up and make sure he/she becomes some prep-school Ivy League success story. Instead, he/she will grow up in foster care or bounced from one home to another until, at age 18, he/she will be thrust out into the real world as an unproductive waste of space.

Of course, that’s only if you were talking politics. Even so, men will always have a different perspective on pregnancy and birth than women. As for myself, I think “no uterus, no opinion.” Men can decide what happens to a baby boy’s foreskin instead…I’ll gladly step aside on that issue.