<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your Royal Screwing Was Just A Fluke, Our Apologies</title>
	<link>http://www.medschoolhell.com/2007/03/02/your-royal-screwing-was-just-a-fluke-our-apologies/</link>
	<description>A Cynical Look At Medical School and Medical Training</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 03:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: J</title>
		<link>http://www.medschoolhell.com/2007/03/02/your-royal-screwing-was-just-a-fluke-our-apologies/#comment-15949</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 05:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.medschoolhell.com/2007/03/02/your-royal-screwing-was-just-a-fluke-our-apologies/#comment-15949</guid>
		<description>When I took the MCAT in Spring 2005, they "lost" one of my two essay submissions -- this was a computer-based test, mind you -- and counted it as a zero.

I freaked out when I received a score in the ~15th percentile for writing;  called the AAMC to ask for a re-grade, but was given such a runaround that I gave up.  Imagine my surprise 6 months later, mid-application-cycle, when I logged in to the AAMC web site to see that my score had suddenly jumped to the 95th percentile!  Two weeks after that, a letter arrived in the mail explaining that their "database system" failed, and they had mis-categorized my second essay.  (Apparently instead of investigating the missing essay up front, they just decided to count it as zero.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I took the MCAT in Spring 2005, they &#8220;lost&#8221; one of my two essay submissions &#8212; this was a computer-based test, mind you &#8212; and counted it as a zero.</p>
<p>I freaked out when I received a score in the ~15th percentile for writing;  called the AAMC to ask for a re-grade, but was given such a runaround that I gave up.  Imagine my surprise 6 months later, mid-application-cycle, when I logged in to the AAMC web site to see that my score had suddenly jumped to the 95th percentile!  Two weeks after that, a letter arrived in the mail explaining that their &#8220;database system&#8221; failed, and they had mis-categorized my second essay.  (Apparently instead of investigating the missing essay up front, they just decided to count it as zero.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BitBitter</title>
		<link>http://www.medschoolhell.com/2007/03/02/your-royal-screwing-was-just-a-fluke-our-apologies/#comment-337</link>
		<dc:creator>BitBitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 19:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.medschoolhell.com/2007/03/02/your-royal-screwing-was-just-a-fluke-our-apologies/#comment-337</guid>
		<description>I looked up the definition for "Fluke" and it didn't say anything about willful refusal to perform quality assurance on a national exam that costs over $200, so I guess Dr Jones is a bit confused...either that or the AAMC believes they don't need to perform to industry standards because of their "noble mission". 

I was B-F'd to the tune of 2 verbal points because of the "tuna finch" passage - thanks for taking the time to keep people informed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I looked up the definition for &#8220;Fluke&#8221; and it didn&#8217;t say anything about willful refusal to perform quality assurance on a national exam that costs over $200, so I guess Dr Jones is a bit confused&#8230;either that or the AAMC believes they don&#8217;t need to perform to industry standards because of their &#8220;noble mission&#8221;. </p>
<p>I was B-F&#8217;d to the tune of 2 verbal points because of the &#8220;tuna finch&#8221; passage - thanks for taking the time to keep people informed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Med School Hell &#187; Ceremony Hell</title>
		<link>http://www.medschoolhell.com/2007/03/02/your-royal-screwing-was-just-a-fluke-our-apologies/#comment-249</link>
		<dc:creator>Med School Hell &#187; Ceremony Hell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 03:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.medschoolhell.com/2007/03/02/your-royal-screwing-was-just-a-fluke-our-apologies/#comment-249</guid>
		<description>[...] to train to become a physician! Luckily for me, the version of the MCAT I took wasn&#8217;t one of the AAMC&#8217;s special ass-raping versions where the passages and questions have no correlation, so I did [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] to train to become a physician! Luckily for me, the version of the MCAT I took wasn&#8217;t one of the AAMC&#8217;s special ass-raping versions where the passages and questions have no correlation, so I did [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: exi</title>
		<link>http://www.medschoolhell.com/2007/03/02/your-royal-screwing-was-just-a-fluke-our-apologies/#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator>exi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 20:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.medschoolhell.com/2007/03/02/your-royal-screwing-was-just-a-fluke-our-apologies/#comment-192</guid>
		<description>Re: "Extrapolated scores could mean a much *higher* or lower result [...]"

Well hey, as far as the emphasized part of this goes, I can imagine some people being happy with it if they still scored reasonably well on the exam.

But yes, this is a pretty notable fuckup, not a "fluke." Silly AAMC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: &#8220;Extrapolated scores could mean a much *higher* or lower result [&#8230;]&#8221;</p>
<p>Well hey, as far as the emphasized part of this goes, I can imagine some people being happy with it if they still scored reasonably well on the exam.</p>
<p>But yes, this is a pretty notable fuckup, not a &#8220;fluke.&#8221; Silly AAMC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hoover</title>
		<link>http://www.medschoolhell.com/2007/03/02/your-royal-screwing-was-just-a-fluke-our-apologies/#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator>Hoover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 20:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.medschoolhell.com/2007/03/02/your-royal-screwing-was-just-a-fluke-our-apologies/#comment-191</guid>
		<description>Ridiculous. A point made in the article

&lt;blockquote&gt;"What’s bubbling to the surface, and what scares me" he said, "is that this organization has a monopoly on the business of making doctors."&lt;/blockquote&gt;

is absolutely true. This is the case with Step I, Step II, etc. as well. The monopoly is a huge problem, too. Just like in business, a monopoly is not healthy in the long run. 

I would like to see a class action lawsuit where every last student who took this flawed version of the MCAT successfully sue the AAMC and win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ridiculous. A point made in the article</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;What’s bubbling to the surface, and what scares me&#8221; he said, &#8220;is that this organization has a monopoly on the business of making doctors.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>is absolutely true. This is the case with Step I, Step II, etc. as well. The monopoly is a huge problem, too. Just like in business, a monopoly is not healthy in the long run. </p>
<p>I would like to see a class action lawsuit where every last student who took this flawed version of the MCAT successfully sue the AAMC and win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.321 seconds -->
